INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

5.3 upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2010 | 06:37 AM
  #11  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

I agree, that cam in a 5.3 wouldn't fall into my personal category of "streetable" as in a daily driver. It will have a high powerband and require a high stall converter or it will be soggy down low. I'd also recommend headwork such as porting and milling. The TR220 is a proven 5.3 performer that will work well with the compression and heads in stock form, and will work nicely with a more street friendly 3k-3200 converter. There are a lot of guys around here who daily drive 3600+ converters, but it can be a pain in the butt on a daily basis, especially when you're groggy and sitting in traffic on your way to work in the AM.
Old 01-15-2010 | 09:13 AM
  #12  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

I daily drive mine
Old 01-15-2010 | 10:23 AM
  #13  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
I daily drive mine
You were one of the guys that I was referring to

You runnin a 3600 or 3800 Scott?
Old 01-15-2010 | 12:52 PM
  #14  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Originally Posted by budhayes3
You were one of the guys that I was referring to

You runnin a 3600 or 3800 Scott?
It's in between there somewhere. Stall speed changes with your powerband, so be aware of that when choosing a cam/converter combo. With my old 216/220, I might have had a little more torque in the low low RPM band, and it used to feel like it was looser. When I swapped to the 228, the immediate flashing of the torque converter felt like it tightened up some, but the RPM extensions stayed the same from what I can tell.
Old 01-15-2010 | 02:10 PM
  #15  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Yea, I'm expecting to see a decent change from when I use my Circle-D triple disc behind my current set up, then go to an LQ9. Chris said it should be about 2600-2800 behind my 5.3, and probably around 2800-3000 behind the 6.0...can't wait
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dan Neumann
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
11
08-07-2022 09:06 AM
pjb1972
New Members
2
09-17-2015 02:06 PM
BigEd_72455
GM Parts Classifieds
4
08-08-2015 07:37 PM
MS3Z
FUEL SYSTEMS
8
07-30-2015 06:17 PM
Jake75
FORCED INDUCTION
11
07-22-2015 09:20 PM



Quick Reply: 5.3 upgrades



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.