INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

5.3L vs 6.0L Head Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2010, 11:01 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cali92rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.3L vs 6.0L Head Question

Eventually, once I save enough money (which could take a while since I am getting married next month ) I would like to swap out my 5.3L to a 6.0L.
Since I am ****, I am already researching everything involved, and I came across the fact that 5.3 engines came with aluminum heads and 6.0 engines came with iron heads. Why would GM do that? Which ones flow better and what other differences were there?

Thanks for the edumucation
Old 08-04-2010, 11:30 AM
  #2  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

First off, welcome to the site! There's a lot of great info and awesome folks here to help you out The 6.0 engines only came with iron heads in 99-00, then in 01 they switched to 317 casting aluminum heads. In stock form, the 6.0 heads flow better than the 5.3 heads, but 5.3 heads will allow for more compression when bolted on to a 6.0. You can search this section using keywords similar to your thread title and you'll find oodles and oodles of info

*EDIT* Moving this to the internal engine section to help your search, as when I referred to "this" section
Old 08-04-2010, 11:58 AM
  #3  
Baltimore Whore
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Also note, that the engines (6.0's) that had the iron heads also had a longer cranks shaft, which makes things a pita to install, if getting matted to a 4L60e trans.. Best bet is to not even consider a iron headed 6.0
Old 08-04-2010, 12:04 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cali92rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the response guys, that helps out

FYI, I have been a member of this site for 5 years, but have been mostly a lurker.
I havent done much to the truck...but now that i am past the 100K mark and my warranty is expired, eff it LOL
Old 08-04-2010, 06:27 PM
  #5  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cali92rs
Thanks for the response guys, that helps out

FYI, I have been a member of this site for 5 years, but have been mostly a lurker.
I havent done much to the truck...but now that i am past the 100K mark and my warranty is expired, eff it LOL
Yea, and now that you're active and posting, we'll have you spending your paycheck on your truck real quick lol

Wow, a member since 05, I didn't even notice that when I welcomed you to the site! That's a lot of lurking lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3lSilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
25
08-29-2016 12:48 AM
Denali08
FORCED INDUCTION
12
08-09-2015 04:34 PM
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
08-01-2015 07:45 AM
oharajo
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
2
07-18-2015 09:24 PM
fcompean
FORCED INDUCTION
21
07-15-2015 09:55 PM



Quick Reply: 5.3L vs 6.0L Head Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.