INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

502, 540 etc..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2009, 12:23 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 502, 540 etc..

This is on down the road but i figured id start asking a few question.

We are going to be installing a whipple on 8.1L (496ci) motor. From what ive gathered these are sorta one off motors. There are not a lot of parts out there and heads are very expensive....

So if i have a motor issue on down the road i was thinking about going bigger with it.. but it seem like thats not a option do to parts..

What im wondering is what about doing that 502 block then stroking it to 540ci motor.. do set of heads, then reinstall the whipple.

Or if you have any other ideas im game..
Old 02-05-2009, 03:34 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,293
Received 254 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

If its a 2.3, it should be way too small. They use those on 5.4 fords. But if its a 3.3 I would think it would work. But damn, talk about torque!
Old 02-05-2009, 03:54 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
DRAENOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scott, LA
Posts: 96
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
If its a 2.3, it should be way too small.
Twin Whipples
Old 02-05-2009, 03:55 PM
  #4  
hog
TECH Fanatic
 
hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Woodstock Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 8.1 has many similarities to the GEN V/VI bigblocks. Firing order is different, but you can swap roller cams between the families to fix this.

Guys have used the 4.37" 8.1L crank to build stroker engine in the 454/502 blocks.

peace
Hog
Old 02-09-2009, 09:01 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
TieRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC MO
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You would be better with a 572. Both the 572 and 8.1l are tall decks. The engine mounts bolt pattern is different. Accessory's are different too.
I saw a article some time back. They did Whipple 3.3 on a 572. 8 psi it made 1000hp.
Old 02-12-2009, 03:03 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TieRod
You would be better with a 572. Both the 572 and 8.1l are tall decks. The engine mounts bolt pattern is different. Accessory's are different too.
I saw a article some time back. They did Whipple 3.3 on a 572. 8 psi it made 1000hp.
DAMN..... thats what i need.... 1000 hp suburban to pull the supra.... ill just wait until this one comes appart...

Orderd my cam last week, now just need the $$ for injectors..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJaxtheimer
STEREO & ELECTRONICS
13
10-31-2015 07:58 PM
Staggered 02
Member Feedback
6
10-09-2015 05:19 PM
smokeshow
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
2
08-23-2015 08:23 PM
Orange_crush
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
6
05-10-2006 10:23 PM
retsell
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
28
12-25-2004 03:14 PM



Quick Reply: 502, 540 etc..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.