INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

cam for 4.8. tr220 or tsp212/218?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2010, 07:08 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
b_evans06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jonesboro, Arkansas
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default cam for 4.8. tr220 or tsp212/218?

Looking for a cam kit for my 84 cutlass. Motor is a 4.8 and I have talked to both companies and this is what they each recommended for my setup. My question is will I gain anything by choosing one over the other? Or will the difference be minimal? Setup is a carbed 4.8, th350, 3600 stall, 3.73's, and ~3200lbs. And the choices specs are: tr220/220 .551/.551 and the tsp212/218 .558/.563. Any other recommendations are welcome. Thanks.
Old 04-15-2010, 07:10 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Between those two I'd choose the tr220, but I would not go any bigger than that.
Old 04-15-2010, 07:17 PM
  #3  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm running the 222/224 566 568 112, pulls hard in my truck, and drives perfect.
Old 04-15-2010, 07:17 PM
  #4  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'd go with the TR220 also, considering the weight of the vehicle and the 3600 converter. That converter should compliment that cam in a 4.8 nicely. I love that generation of Cutlass/Monte Carlo. I used to have an 85 Monte SS myself, and have seen a few with LS1/6 etc...the GENIII engine looks like it was meant to be in there
Old 04-15-2010, 07:26 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
b_evans06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jonesboro, Arkansas
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the quick replies. I will more than likely order the tr220 since most reviews favor it. Yea I like these cars a lot. This one I bought of an old lady who bought it new. It has 76k miles on it with full documentation, window sticker, owners manual, etc. Her son borrowed it and locked the motor up in it and she sold it to me. It is a brougham with mint condition interior but the exterior is really faded.
Old 04-15-2010, 08:22 PM
  #6  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by b_evans06
Thanks for the quick replies. I will more than likely order the tr220 since most reviews favor it. Yea I like these cars a lot. This one I bought of an old lady who bought it new. It has 76k miles on it with full documentation, window sticker, owners manual, etc. Her son borrowed it and locked the motor up in it and she sold it to me. It is a brougham with mint condition interior but the exterior is really faded.
That's awesome man, gotta love those low mile, like new old lady cars. Those mid 80's GM rides were known for fading interiors, as well as fading paint. Has the headliner started drooping yet lol...they all did that too, the adhesive wears out and the headliner fabric separates from the panel...my Monte did, my uncle's Chevy wagon did it...every GM car from the 80's did it...I've seen zip ties, staple gun jobs...one guy used spray adhesive that he sprayed right up on it and somehow held it up until it dried, and when it was done it looked perfect

*EDIT* Post up some pics of that ride in the Show and Shine section if you could
Old 04-15-2010, 08:26 PM
  #7  
Baltimore Whore
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

TR220 with that verter for sure.. BTW a pic of the 85 beater.. Like you it was bought off a old lady with 57k on the ticker, just some front end damage that was a easy fix for 170 buks.. This could poss be the candidate for the 6.0 once it comes out of the truck


Last edited by Mangled03gmc; 04-15-2010 at 08:38 PM.
Old 04-15-2010, 09:14 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
jg53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: kyle tx
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im liking the choices for this! that cam/engine/converter should compliment each other very well. nice looking ride, what a steal!
Old 04-15-2010, 09:33 PM
  #9  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Nice ride there John, the G-bodies are my absolute favorite. I'd like to have another mid-late 80's Monte or Cutlass again someday with a GENIII mill for sure. Wish I never got rid of my SS, but I used it as a trade in on my truck.

Hey, I'm supposed to keep things on track here lol...can't help myself, I love G-bodies!
Old 04-15-2010, 09:37 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
b_evans06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jonesboro, Arkansas
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't care one bit if this thread turns into g-body talk lol. I just uploaded the pics of the car to photobucket I will post them in the show and shine section in just a sec. Its not real pretty now but I only paid $200 bucks for it


Quick Reply: cam for 4.8. tr220 or tsp212/218?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.