IMD

iTrader: (10)

thats great, try thinking outside the crack pipe instead.

nightrunner

iTrader: (4)

in the usable rpm range, a ****** honda will make more torque than that motor. there IS a reason no one has used that motor yet. that motor is setup to be run at very high rpms constantly, as in a road racing application

jkwalkercchs

iTrader: (20)

crack does the body good





yea i know but i wanna a high revvin truck
ill just drive it around like im racing

nightrunner

iTrader: (4)

then go ahead and do the build. and then the entire forum will laugh at you when you complain about spending money on a engine build and it doesnt make any power before 5krpms and takes more maintenance than an full blown dragster. there is a reason that no body on here daily drives a truck with a solid roller valvetrain.

jkwalkercchs

iTrader: (20)

no my daily driver is now a sportster 1200 custom

whats the diff in this and a 4.8 turbocharged?

nightrunner

iTrader: (4)

a 4.8 turbocharged, if a quality turbo kit is used, will maintain stock reliability, and with a properly sized turbo, start spooling at approx 2500 rpm and have full boost at 3500rpm and be MUCH faster than your proposed NA setup and get MUCH better fuel economy

jkwalkercchs

iTrader: (20)

did u miss the post i made about i wanna go turbo???

IMD

iTrader: (10)

ahh a sportster. that explains alot.

jkwalkercchs

iTrader: (20)

whats wrong with sportster??

nightrunner

iTrader: (4)

i did miss that part BUT, what is the point in revving so high when you have a turbo? i dont remember the exact problems but i have read about having problems when revving over 7krpm when FI is used. maybe problems with getting valve springs to support the presures and not let the valves float. also for much boost you will need down to around 9:1 or lower. also forget about a solid roller with a turbo