INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

which heads? L92s or stage 2 243s???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2011, 04:27 PM
  #11  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AndysC3
A stock internal LQ9 with 243 heads and stock head gaskets will have about a 10.4:1 compression.
Originally Posted by 05gmcsierra
Not too sure but I think 243s will take ur compression too high.. but let's c if anyone else can chime in..
No sirs, it's basically the same as an LS2 at that point which is right at 10.9:1 static compression.

OP, the L92 will not clear (piston to valve) with either of those camshaft and the L92 heads. I'd go with the PRC Stage 1 LS6 heads and the MS4 if you are wanting that big of a camshaft. We can set them up to clear perfectly, and have a nice tax time special going right now!
Old 02-15-2011, 08:11 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
dry_kill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: houston tx
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
No sirs, it's basically the same as an LS2 at that point which is right at 10.9:1 static compression.

OP, the L92 will not clear (piston to valve) with either of those camshaft and the L92 heads. I'd go with the PRC Stage 1 LS6 heads and the MS4 if you are wanting that big of a camshaft. We can set them up to clear perfectly, and have a nice tax time special going right now!
Do you think the stage 1's would get me to my goal of 11s? can you PM me the deals you all have going right now?
Old 02-15-2011, 08:35 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
D_reks{5.3}'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bako
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

L92/Ls3 heads are about half the price of stage 1 or 2 heads and will still net you great results, And I bet you could get away with the Trex cam, Just try and keep your lift around .62x and lower. Few setups like that around here and no PTV issues....
Old 02-16-2011, 09:14 AM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by D_reks{5.3}
L92/Ls3 heads are about half the price of stage 1 or 2 heads and will still net you great results, And I bet you could get away with the Trex cam, Just try and keep your lift around .62x and lower. Few setups like that around here and no PTV issues....
Max valve lift has very little to do with piston to valve clearance actually!
Old 02-16-2011, 12:01 PM
  #15  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Max valve lift has very little to do with piston to valve clearance actually!
It's more about how long you hold the valve open while the piston is on it's way up, correct? (duration, in other words)
Old 02-16-2011, 12:09 PM
  #16  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,318
Received 226 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

i stuck with the 243 heads...im guna be flycutting the pistons though.
Old 02-16-2011, 01:15 PM
  #17  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by budhayes3
It's more about how long you hold the valve open while the piston is on it's way up, correct? (duration, in other words)
It's the low lift duration numbers (and a little duration at .050") that determine how fast or slow the valves comes off the seat. The more aggressive lobes that have more duration at .006" (with the same duration at .050") will be making that valve open and close at a faster rate (ramp rate). If you think about it, the contact will always occur just a handful of degrees before and after TDC, when the valves are just opening and closing.
Old 02-16-2011, 01:23 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Dezert1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also advancing the cam decreases intake PTV clearance as well as running a tighter LSA. The large 2.160 intake valve on LS3/L92 heads is the reason for less intake duration allowed on a piston that isn't fly cut or setup with valve reliefs to clear for the large intake valves.
Old 02-16-2011, 02:00 PM
  #19  
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (48)
 
fastrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Midlothian, Texas
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ahh, good info. I didnt think about the huge intake valves. True about the wider lsa being better for PTV. OP, I would get a custom spec cam.
Old 02-16-2011, 04:12 PM
  #20  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,318
Received 226 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

you could always just make a cookie cutter version of Skeet's motor. it's proven.


Quick Reply: which heads? L92s or stage 2 243s???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM.