INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

I know that in 05 the rods on the lq motors changed??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2009, 07:15 PM
  #21  
Baltimore Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dlt76028
if its a brand new engine I don't really see a difference in reliability?

And John, I was just giving you a hard time.. you putting the procharger back on?
Yes I am going to put the blower back on, gona shoot for some where around 15-18 psi, not sure yet... Like stated the 370 seems to be more friendly, cause of the rod angle from having the stroker crank and what not.. Not that it (408) isn't reliable but big hp can be had from the weee 370 Yes I know you were giving me a hard time, as most of my fellow ***** tend to do..
Old 08-17-2009, 07:21 PM
  #22  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
dlt76028's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Crowley, TX
Posts: 5,883
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
In that case, I suggest you do a bit of reading. There's a real good thread on this very topic if you do a search.
I just read through that whole thread and it seemed to me more people were leaning towards the 408. More cubes equal less boost and less rpm to make the same power as the 370, which in turn equals longer life... IMO
Old 08-18-2009, 03:35 AM
  #23  
Teching In
iTrader: (6)
 
turbocody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rowlett,Tx
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, since the 05+ have the better rods, does anyone know if the rods bolts are better too? I dont think I've heard a failure on ls2 rod bolts.
Old 08-18-2009, 06:29 AM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
03 BLACKOUTSSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 1,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dlt76028
I just read through that whole thread and it seemed to me more people were leaning towards the 408. More cubes equal less boost and less rpm to make the same power as the 370, which in turn equals longer life... IMO
Correct, however its the heads that matter in that case. It doesn't really matter if its a 370, 408 or a 572...if it can only take in so much air, it will not change the power that much. Now if he was putting a set of Aero Heads on there, Id say the bigger the better.

Plus, the rod deflection angle on a stroker motor is greater than that of an N/A setup, and in boosted situation, especially heavy boost like what John is talking about, less deflection of the rods from the crank centerline will be a more reliable motor. Not nearly as likely to spin a bearing.
Old 08-19-2009, 11:27 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
StrokerAce03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by turbocody
Ok, since the 05+ have the better rods, does anyone know if the rods bolts are better too? I dont think I've heard a failure on ls2 rod bolts.
If you're upgrading rods then it'd be a good time to go ahead with some ARP's since you're there anyway. Just cheap insurance.
Old 08-19-2009, 11:44 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dlt76028
I just read through that whole thread and it seemed to me more people were leaning towards the 408. More cubes equal less boost and less rpm to make the same power as the 370, which in turn equals longer life... IMO
You are completely ignoring all the geometry and such that goes along with a longer stroke. It will consume more oil and it will not be as reliable in the long run as the 370. With boost I see really no reason whatsoever to go with the 408 over the 370, unless you got money to spend.
Old 08-20-2009, 10:45 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
1Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jones Creek, Texas
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Actually I'm somewhat suprised that I have not seen anyone use one of the reasonably new GM LSX 3.750" stroke 4340 cranks. I understand that most folks that are going to spend the money for a forged crank can't help themselves and get the largest stroke that will easily fit in the bottom of the motor, but the 1/4" less stroke would go along way's improving the longetivity of these stroker motors. Besides that, an old school sized 383 just sounds about right for a good small-block.
Old 08-21-2009, 07:20 AM
  #28  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All of the 05' newer engines got the better rods. The 03' +LQ9's were the first to get better rods BTW.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TXsilverado
FORCED INDUCTION
48
11-26-2015 10:54 AM
Jake75
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
6
08-05-2015 01:26 PM
jmarkway
GM Parts Classifieds
2
07-18-2015 09:23 PM
black6spdz
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
9
07-16-2015 01:32 AM
caviness
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
07-05-2015 10:49 PM



Quick Reply: I know that in 05 the rods on the lq motors changed??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.