let me raddle your brain on this... plz help
#11
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW, Tx
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PappyDan
Lets see where your going with this.
your 4.8 head has a 61.15 cc chamber and 1.89/ 1.55 valves
with a piston size of 3,779 with a stroke of 3,270 to give you
A compression of 9.49.
your 243 ls1 heads come with a 66.67 cc chamber and 2.00/ 1.55 valves
to work with a piston size of 3,893 with a stroke of 3,622 to give it
A compression of 10.19.
now the 243 heads will flow better but you increased your
chamber size on a smaller piston and a smaller stroke
That will drop your compression down close to a 9.0 or even a 8.9.
their is no cam on this world that will make up the lost power
From the lower compression on your 4.8.
Now a turbo or a supercharger would love this kind of low compression.
the best way to go is to shave 0.20 or 0.30 off of your 4.8 heads to up
Compression from 9.49 to a close 10.0.
Then add your cam for more power.
your 4.8 head has a 61.15 cc chamber and 1.89/ 1.55 valves
with a piston size of 3,779 with a stroke of 3,270 to give you
A compression of 9.49.
your 243 ls1 heads come with a 66.67 cc chamber and 2.00/ 1.55 valves
to work with a piston size of 3,893 with a stroke of 3,622 to give it
A compression of 10.19.
now the 243 heads will flow better but you increased your
chamber size on a smaller piston and a smaller stroke
That will drop your compression down close to a 9.0 or even a 8.9.
their is no cam on this world that will make up the lost power
From the lower compression on your 4.8.
Now a turbo or a supercharger would love this kind of low compression.
the best way to go is to shave 0.20 or 0.30 off of your 4.8 heads to up
Compression from 9.49 to a close 10.0.
Then add your cam for more power.
#12
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
wait....pappy made a mistake in his math. the chambers on 243 heads are 64.45cc not 66.67. 66.67 is the compression of a stock LS1 head. the compression will still be lower but not as bad as pappys math shows using the wrong chamber size.
Last edited by TXsilverado; 09-28-2007 at 12:37 PM.
#14
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
Originally Posted by PappyDan
damn it, well i was not too far off from the top of my head.
243 is LS6 not LS1 guess i need to read that book again.
thanks stew for the correction.
243 is LS6 not LS1 guess i need to read that book again.
thanks stew for the correction.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InsaneDomestics
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
5
07-27-2015 02:42 PM