INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Low End Torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2012 | 05:52 PM
  #11  
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: A small town, MS
Default

But on the 6.0, wouldn't you benefit more from something larger, say around a 218/224, or in that vecinity? Wouldn't the torque curve be so low in the rpms with the smaller cam in the 6.0 that the power would drop off too soon in the upper rpms? Or am I thinkin too radical on this?
Old 01-11-2012 | 06:20 PM
  #12  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

The one in my sig makes good torque!
Old 01-11-2012 | 09:04 PM
  #13  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Gotta remember he is pushing a lot heavier truck than most of us, Id go with the 206/212 and a set of 243 heads to bump up the compression. That should help out on the low end a lot.
Old 01-11-2012 | 09:23 PM
  #14  
00silvylq4's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

I have a voodoo 217/223 in mine. Still thinking about the 243 heads.
Old 01-12-2012 | 10:40 AM
  #15  
slow2008's Avatar
formerly slow03 (11-04-2011)
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Default

I'd vote the SDPC HT1 214/218 .559/.562 111lsa
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zblee
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
63
06-10-2023 02:25 PM
fctry286
FORCED INDUCTION
16
11-22-2015 04:26 PM
JordanH
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
08-08-2015 08:59 PM
OLD BULL
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
13
08-01-2015 06:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.