INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

lq4 vs. lq9 what CR will i end up with?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2008, 09:38 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
06sierra5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default lq4 vs. lq9 what CR will i end up with?

im looking for an lq9 to build to swap in place of my 5.3. i was told by Dave at WCCH that i should be running a combustion chamber around 72-74cc. im not sure what compression ratio this would give me. i was thinking, if i came across an lq4 for a decent price, can i make up for the dished pistons by using a smaller combustion chamber on the heads? like a 62-64cc

1. how do i figure out what my compression ratio will be with the combustion chamber? what would an lq4 ratio be with 64 cc heads?

2. for a daily driver, what would be too high of a compression ratio?

3. if i wanted to add 100 shot of nitrous down the road, how would i account for that? is there a rule of thumb how many compression points to drop for nitrous?
Old 03-09-2008, 09:42 PM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (73)
 
Derek @ EDO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

you dont drop compression for nitrous!

Nitrous LOVES compression!

I calculated 10.4:1 on 64cc
Old 03-09-2008, 09:54 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
06sierra5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

haha sounds good

isnt 10.4 about where the lq9 is stock? id like to go a bit higher. can i run 11:1 reliably?
Old 03-10-2008, 12:12 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Zick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LQ9 is 10.1:1 stock.
I ran about 11.5 w/ my LQ9 setup in my old 03'. Not sure what you mean by reliably. But with the right tuning you can run 11:1 just fine.
Old 03-10-2008, 12:22 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
06sierra5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

it gets 120+ out here in the summer and we only hve 91 octane i dont want it pinging. i talked to richard at WCCH this morning. i think hes gonna help me pick my setup.
Old 03-10-2008, 12:24 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Zick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Again with the right tuning anything is possible.
I was run on 87* octane with no detonation but I had to lower the timing by quite a bit.
It was definitely nice having HPT to be able to change my tune when I saw fit.
Old 03-10-2008, 01:19 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
hirdlej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,470
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For every 1cc lost, you'll gain about a tenth of a compression point. I obtained 10:1 compression out of my LQ4 using 64cc LS6 heads, and cometic .040" MLS headgaskets. That's with NO machine work on the heads. With the **** poor quality gasoline coming up the the near future, I wouldn't go much higher than that. Here's a good LS based compression calc to play with. http://www.c5frc.com/calculators/Com...Calculator.htm
Old 03-10-2008, 01:50 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
06sierra5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

thatnks for the link. yeah ive noticed the gas in the last 5 years or so has become noticeably different in smell and texture. not lookin good.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluecollar Hotrods
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
11
06-11-2024 11:37 PM
chevy6.0fan
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
08-20-2015 07:10 PM
The_W
FUEL SYSTEMS
4
08-15-2015 08:07 AM
Aboss
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
08-11-2015 09:05 AM
Denali08
FORCED INDUCTION
12
08-09-2015 04:34 PM



Quick Reply: lq4 vs. lq9 what CR will i end up with?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.