INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

LS1 heads on a 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2010, 04:19 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LOUDMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS1 heads on a 5.3

Putting together a 5.3 and I have a set of LS1 heads and a set of 5.3 heads. Both stock. Just out of interest was wandering if anyone new which head would be a better choice on a slightly modified setup? Not looking to modify the heads.
Old 01-30-2010, 04:22 PM
  #2  
Praise The Lowered
iTrader: (17)
 
RibeiroBJJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You will lose power with the ls1 heads due to the larger Chambers...get a mild port and 3 angle valve job on your stock heads...........
Old 01-30-2010, 06:06 PM
  #3  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'd talk to Richard at WCCH and see what they have to offer...they used to have a StageI 5.3 head that tdrumm was running on his truck. IIRC, they were worth 20 or 30 HP on the dyno.
Old 01-30-2010, 08:14 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
regcabls6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: simi valley, CA
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

richard ported my 706's (5.3) and they flow just under 300cfm. infact im goin to use them on the 402 im building.
Old 01-30-2010, 10:10 PM
  #5  
Teching In
 
ATTITUDE ADJUSTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

trans ams have 241s i think the 241s have biger valves than the 706s.if u mill them wont that be enough to compensate for the larger combustion chamber???
Old 01-31-2010, 10:44 AM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
acethedragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ls1 and 5.3 heads are the same. only difference is the ls1 chamber is a little bigger by 3 to 4cc. valves and ports are same. Attitude, your thinking bout the 243s. they have bigger ports and intake valve. Loudman, just look into a little port work on the 5.3 heads and it will rock.
Old 01-31-2010, 10:47 AM
  #7  
Praise The Lowered
iTrader: (17)
 
RibeiroBJJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acethedragon
ls1 and 5.3 heads are the same. only difference is the ls1 chamber is a little bigger by 3 to 4cc. valves and ports are same. Attitude, your thinking bout the 243s. they have bigger ports and intake valve. Loudman, just look into a little port work on the 5.3 heads and it will rock.
Intake valves are larger as well..
Old 01-31-2010, 02:54 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LOUDMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks. seems like the 5.3 heads sound like the better option. Now just throwing this out there as food for thought, since this is just a temporary backup, if i have the block bored to 3.90 would it be better to port the 5.3 heads or just use the LS1's.

sorry bout the hypotheticals just dont want to spend a lot of money on this set up but dont want to put together a complete turd.

comparing 852's to 241's if it make a difference

Last edited by LOUDMAN; 01-31-2010 at 03:10 PM.
Old 01-31-2010, 07:45 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
01midmetws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acethedragon
ls1 and 5.3 heads are the same. only difference is the ls1 chamber is a little bigger by 3 to 4cc. valves and ports are same. Attitude, your thinking bout the 243s. they have bigger ports and intake valve. Loudman, just look into a little port work on the 5.3 heads and it will rock.
Incorrect kind Sir,
243's and 241/853's share 2.00/1.55 valves. 5.3 heads have 1.89/1.55" valves and a 61.1cc chamber. 241's have a better casting that supports higher flow than the 853's. 243's are the best factory LS1 style head to date with 64.5cc chamber and a more efficient chamber and port design that is nearly identical to the 317 (317 uses a 71cc chamber).

Originally Posted by LOUDMAN
Thanks. seems like the 5.3 heads sound like the better option. Now just throwing this out there as food for thought, since this is just a temporary backup, if i have the block bored to 3.90 would it be better to port the 5.3 heads or just use the LS1's.

sorry bout the hypotheticals just dont want to spend a lot of money on this set up but dont want to put together a complete turd.

comparing 852's to 241's if it make a difference
If you are thinking about doing a set of budget heads find some 243' for $450 on tech and get them milled .030" to get a chamber that is the same size as a stock 5.3 but promote much better flow. Or simply get your stockers ported by a "reputable" company. If you already have some 241's you can cut .035-.040 off of them to retain stock compression and add a little extra power.
Old 01-31-2010, 08:53 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LOUDMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

would shaving the heads cause clearance issues with a high lift cam?


Quick Reply: LS1 heads on a 5.3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.