INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Opinions on max effort cam for LQ9...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2024, 05:47 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 2,097
Received 62 Likes on 51 Posts
Default Opinions on max effort cam for LQ9...

With a twist.

LQ9 short block, ported 243s, LSXRT 102, LT headers, freeflowing exhaust system with cut outs. E85, 4L80E, 4.56 gears, 4400-4450 lb truck w/o driver.

Currently have a 228/236 @ .050 cam .598"/.602" lift 115 LSA + 0

Goal is to go as fast as possible, still maintain some sort of streetability. But, not be a daily driver anymore. Likely will end up with a 4000-4400 converter.

Would you stick with that cam? Or go with something else? I ran a nearly identical cam in an LS1 based 383, AFR 205s, FAST 90mm, LTs, etc, etc. It ran really well on 93, but in a 900lb lighter vehicle with 28s and 3.73s

I was previously convinced that this cam was "it." Now, I'm second guessing myself.

Old 07-10-2024, 02:30 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
1redta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: fort campbell
Posts: 568
Received 45 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

900lbs is a bit of extra weight 😆

have you contacted any of the popular shops for input?
Old 07-10-2024, 08:14 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 300
Received 149 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

With E85, mill the 243 heads down .030", use Cometic .044" thick gaskets, and @Summitracing SUM-8710R1 230/242 113+3 .625/.605. Plan on shifting a little past 6500rpm.
Old 07-11-2024, 05:39 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 2,097
Received 62 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1redta
900lbs is a bit of extra weight 😆

have you contacted any of the popular shops for input?
Truck VS F Body. Not yet, BTR and Cam Motion are on the short list.
Old 07-13-2024, 12:40 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 2,097
Received 62 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 68Formula
With E85, mill the 243 heads down .030", use Cometic .044" thick gaskets, and @Summitracing SUM-8710R1 230/242 113+3 .625/.605. Plan on shifting a little past 6500rpm.
I looked at that cam. These are what has been recommended so far
Comp - 231/239 .617/.624 113 or 231/247 .617/.624 113
Tick - 237/242 .633/.608 111+3 or 233/240 .627/.607 112+2
TSP - 232/234 .600/.600 112 or 231/234 .629/.615 111

Old 07-13-2024, 03:54 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
aslack99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Didn't know you got rid of the Chopacabra and small heads. I would call Cammotion.
Old 07-13-2024, 09:36 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 2,097
Received 62 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aslack99
Didn't know you got rid of the Chopacabra and small heads. I would call Cammotion.
Not yet, I have an LQ9 going together and the heads went to Texas Speed yesterday. I'm looking at swapping the engine, transmission, and converter next spring.

I'm going to get my damn 12 second time slips out of the current LQ4, 862 heads, Chopacabra combo. I want to test a set of milled 799s on it before I pull this engine too. For "science"
The following users liked this post:
aslack99 (07-14-2024)
Old 07-15-2024, 01:13 PM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,319
Received 226 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bluecollar Hotrods
I looked at that cam. These are what has been recommended so far
Comp - 231/239 .617/.624 113 or 231/247 .617/.624 113
Tick - 237/242 .633/.608 111+3 or 233/240 .627/.607 112+2
TSP - 232/234 .600/.600 112 or 231/234 .629/.615 111
what size tires on the truck? of the options above I like the lower lift TSP grind. In a heavy truck bigger isn't always better. I've run a 231/239, 237/242, 226/226, 228/232, 226/226, 247/255 in various 5.7 & 6.0 cathedral head combos. From memory I gained nothing going from a 226/226 to a 231/239 on a 5.7 with ported patriot 226 heads. no time gained running N/A, but drivability suffered. some of those wide split specs seem more geared towards square port heads. be sure to measure PTV before any of those cams with the
The following users liked this post:
Bluecollar Hotrods (07-15-2024)
Old 07-15-2024, 01:50 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 2,097
Received 62 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
what size tires on the truck? of the options above I like the lower lift TSP grind. In a heavy truck bigger isn't always better. I've run a 231/239, 237/242, 226/226, 228/232, 226/226, 247/255 in various 5.7 & 6.0 cathedral head combos. From memory I gained nothing going from a 226/226 to a 231/239 on a 5.7 with ported patriot 226 heads. no time gained running N/A, but drivability suffered. some of those wide split specs seem more geared towards square port heads. be sure to measure PTV before any of those cams with the
Currently 29.5" tall M/T Radial Pros. (315/50R17) I'm switching to a 295/65R15 when these wear out.

I agree on checking PTV, anything approaching 23x on the intake side is usually where I start getting concerned.

Based on your results, maybe I need to stay with my 228/236 cam.
Old 07-15-2024, 04:28 PM
  #10  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,395
Received 789 Likes on 655 Posts
Default

What about #TSP-228232-112 = 228/232 .600/.600 112 LSA

I almost went for the Torquer V2 cam myself for a similar combo. Decided to step it back to a 224/228 combo. #TSP-224228R6112

Just haven't been able to swap the motor yet.


Quick Reply: Opinions on max effort cam for LQ9...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.