INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Roller rockers and UD pulley/balncer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2009 | 10:40 AM
  #21  
1BadAction's Avatar
Registered abuser
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 2
From: Briar, TX!
Default

the weight on the crank from the pulley, even our big truck version, is close to the CL and has very little effect on throttle response. don't sweat it.

FWIW- when I went from a stock heavy weight steel flywheel in my WS6 to a new clutch and the light wheel that came with it. -15lbs (IIRC, might have been more) and double the diameter of what a crank pulley is, didnt notice a bit of difference... well, other than the car was harder to accelerate gently from a dead stop in traffic. I ended up getting a stock weight FW after a few months of that BS.
Old 03-31-2009 | 12:31 PM
  #22  
skyhighsami's Avatar
Thread Starter
no title here
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 3
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

With this being my wife's vehicle I have no desire to have any issues. I really want to make sure that this new powerplant works just like stock only with a lot more power. So I guess I will be working stock pulley and rockers maybe. I just don't want there to be problems or run the risk of anything having anything not work the way the factory designed it. So I guess I will be putting in the motor with a little more compression, better heads, bigger cam, 8.1 injectors, and maybe a small stall. The only issue that I am prepared to deal with is the tranny coming apart shortly after the motor is up and running.
Old 03-31-2009 | 01:58 PM
  #23  
sickREDsierra's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Mobile, AL
Default

i would def save the money on UDP and RR and put in the tranny savings fund.

i run stock RR and stock CP, and these are internally balanced engines..... my engine was built/internally balanced with the stock pulley on it, i am not going to change that for 5 hp.

good luck on the build man..
Old 03-31-2009 | 02:19 PM
  #24  
skyhighsami's Avatar
Thread Starter
no title here
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 3
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

As long as this motor makes 375-400 at the wheels I will be super happy. I think with the heads, compression, and cam it should be doable. It is HirdleJ's old cam and he made 360 whp 400 tq and I will have almost a half a point more compression, and Dart 225 heads instead of factory casting heads. I wouldn't think it would make any less power than his setup other than the drivetrain differences playing games with the measured output at the wheels. I was only thinking that I needed to pull out all the stops to reach my goal. I didn't realize how many people ran the stock pulleys and rockers. Only time will tell. Thanks for the help guys
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gadgetized
FORCED INDUCTION
39
10-22-2015 09:06 AM
KINGCYCLES
GM Parts Classifieds
1
10-02-2015 10:21 AM
redbird555
GM Parts Classifieds
2
09-30-2015 09:28 AM
tim wellington
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
4
09-29-2015 10:17 PM



Quick Reply: Roller rockers and UD pulley/balncer?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.