14.4 to 12.4 with a 100 shot????
01-21-2008 | 01:43 PM
#41
Wow didn't even know this thread was here about my truck. Yes that is my truck and like I said in the other forum my truck's best N/A time was a 14.4 with a 2.1 60" but remember this was with the nitrou's tune and 2 degree colder plugs. If you think about it I can probably go low 14's with just the normal plugs and my street tune. Honest awnser do you actually think that my little 5 cylinder can hold a 150 shot. Before you go off and start saying maybe it's a 125 shot I got me a TNT F2 kit which the jetting only goes by 100, 150, 200, 250, and so on.
I can vouch for this guy i know he has the 100 jets on there, and like we talked at the track Joe, if you want we can try my HSW nozzle and try it with the 125 shot. that little truck really moves and the spray really moves, hurry up so you can get the LS2 in there man
01-21-2008 | 01:45 PM
#42
Staging Lane
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Mcallen TX.
Yeah thanks man. Want to do some custom ground cam's on this motor first and go high 11's on the 100 just to show these guy's what a little 5 cylinder can do.
01-21-2008 | 04:22 PM
#44
well this is where a misunderstanding of my statement is!!!!!!
I didnt say it was one of the fastest or the fastest tracks around!! I simply said the LOCATION of the track is in the right spot, now if they can get someone that knows their stuff about prepping a track i think it would be a killer track. I know that there are better tracks around like HRP i mean come on its a freakin NHRA track it better be good.
I didnt say it was one of the fastest or the fastest tracks around!! I simply said the LOCATION of the track is in the right spot, now if they can get someone that knows their stuff about prepping a track i think it would be a killer track. I know that there are better tracks around like HRP i mean come on its a freakin NHRA track it better be good.
01-21-2008 | 05:57 PM
#45
01-21-2008 | 06:04 PM
#46
Teching In
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Laredo TX.
a good % of ur statement is true. yes we jus might b in one of the best places for a track to be but in no way does that mean that we also have one of the best tracks. Track prep down here goes by the event we're having. If its a regular race day track prep sucks but if something big is going on track is at its best, and RGV boys will vouch for that. (remember the SOUTH TEXAS RACING vs "LAREDO BOYS")
im a laredo boy i can vouch for that also. so when is RGV goin to visit the laredo track? the owner is my friend and he takes track prep very seriously.
01-21-2008 | 10:02 PM
#48
well take for example these top fuel cars, they have to setup everything for the particular track they are running at. A lower sea level track is going to be faster than a higher sea level track, and one thats lower sea level is more than likely going to have a better DA than a higher sea level track. Over here in monroe or shreveport its not too seldom you see a DA under 1000' over there you very seldom see it over 1000' from some people i have talked too. When people get on here stating times i think everyone should be stating the DA as well because that makes a huge difference in times.
Whats the NORMAL DA over there???????
Whats the NORMAL DA over there???????
01-22-2008 | 09:31 AM
#49
Thread Starter
Restricted User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 1
From: FRISCO CALI
i talked to him on the other forum went thru it all we are all good now.
Now has anyone seen a pretty much stock lt1 camaro which i think ran what low 14s stock put a 100 shot in and run low 12s??? Just seeing if the v8s at the same weight pretty much react the same.
Now has anyone seen a pretty much stock lt1 camaro which i think ran what low 14s stock put a 100 shot in and run low 12s??? Just seeing if the v8s at the same weight pretty much react the same.