PROJECTS GALLERY Vehicle builds | Engine Swaps | Conversions | Installation write ups |

I broke'did my toy... Kenne Bell/370 rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2013 | 08:31 AM
  #31  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 61
From: South Shore, MA
Default

So what does that mean exactly?
Old 11-19-2013 | 08:49 AM
  #32  
BigKID's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 141
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

Bore is too large for the piston which will cause them to rock in the bore, be noisy, cause ring flutter, expedited ring/cylinder wear, possible sealing issues and oil consumption.

I am taking the block back to the machinist today with the heads and mains torqued for us to measure together. Depending on what we find with his measuring equipment will determine where we go from here.
Old 11-22-2013 | 08:17 AM
  #33  
BigKID's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 141
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

Update: I found a new machine shop about 3 hours away that is really good with LS engines that I am taking everything to this afternoon. He is going to sonic check the block first to see if we can go 4.040 with a set of custom pistons. He said he has had some 6.0 iron blocks that were really thin in spots even at 4.030.

On another note, I got word that TEA mistakenly build me a set of TFS 245 instead of the 235 that were ordered. They said they would send me the heads for the 235 price. I am a little concerned with the 2.10/1.60 valves on a 4.03-4.04 bore. I also don't want to loose the velocity and responsiveness out of boost either by going to a larger intake runner. Opinions?

Last edited by BigKID; 11-22-2013 at 08:23 AM.
Old 11-22-2013 | 08:29 AM
  #34  
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 5
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Sorry to hear all of this. Hope it works out and this new shop can save the day!
Old 11-22-2013 | 08:30 AM
  #35  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 61
From: South Shore, MA
Default

Sounds like the stars are aligning and its time for a 4.06 bore...

As far as drivability with the heads... I can't imagine that extra 10cc will really push it over the edge.
Old 11-22-2013 | 12:24 PM
  #36  
2doorfury's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 2
From: Franklin, IN
Default

Sorry to hear big kid, lots of money put in the hands of a machine shop with you under the impression they'll do everything right..hopefully this machine shop that did the work will make up for there fault. Beendown this road also with shitty machine shop work. But looks like you'll be ready to duke it out next year! Haha.
Old 02-23-2014 | 07:02 PM
  #37  
BigKID's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 141
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

Build has been kind of stale due to several reasons, holidays, machine shop, parts, etc... but I got a call from machine shop #2 and I should be picking up the block on Friday. I have been gearing myself up to get busy once I have the shortblock in hand. So I thought I would take this oportunity to update the thread with some of the parts I have acquired for the build.

Brian Tooley SLR (slow leak rate) lifters.


Wiseco 4.040 bore custom pistons.


Cam spec'ed my Martin Smallwood at Tick Performance. 225/242 .620/.627 117+6.


Box of install tools...


TEA/TFS 245 heads, 2.10/1.60 valves, 70cc combustion chambers, nitrous exhaust ports








Old 02-23-2014 | 07:14 PM
  #38  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 17
From: Dallas
Default

Badass! Serious parts.
Old 02-23-2014 | 07:36 PM
  #39  
BigKID's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 141
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

Thanks. What is it they say? Go big or go home! I just hope the bigger cam and heads let this 2.8L breathe a little better on the big end like I am hoping.
Old 02-23-2014 | 07:37 PM
  #40  
BigKID's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 141
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

I mocked up the Kenne Bell 2.8 lower manifold to my TEA/TFS 245cc heads and found an interesting matchup. I figured the ports would be significantly smaller on the kb manifold but didn't expect the shape and alignment to be so off. The port floors match up pretty well but the walls and roofs aren't even close. I am planning to open up the manifold ports on the right wall (as looking at the pics below) but am unsure what to do with the roof due to the injector bosses. As for the left wall, it will just have to be the way it is cause I am not touching the port on the heads. Take a look at the pics and let me know what you think about porting the manifold for best flow into the heads.












I also posted this in the forced induction section https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...8/#post5195118

Last edited by BigKID; 03-31-2014 at 08:56 AM. Reason: removed broken link


Quick Reply: I broke'did my toy... Kenne Bell/370 rebuild



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.