PROJECTS GALLERY Vehicle builds | Engine Swaps | Conversions | Installation write ups |

I can't fabricate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2011, 10:10 PM
  #171  
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
silver-mod-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SETx
Posts: 14,314
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I'll be using 200mph tape to put the yokes on
silver-mod-o is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:10 PM
  #172  
On The Tree
 
one fast ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sudbury ontario
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by outlawz2004
lets just hope it doesnt come to this.

LMAO Dude your article is funny as hell!
one fast ss is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:16 PM
  #173  
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
silver-mod-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SETx
Posts: 14,314
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

In all seriousness... To maintain braking, improve braking, and save weight, why not go to some nicer calipers and rotors up front and consider driveline braking for the rear one rotor and caliper stops both wheels... Less weight, more efficient, more mechanical advantage etc..

Nevermind, don't, this will cause you to try and build something else... And spend more than $100... My best advice, keep the stock ****, put fresh pads and rotors all the way around and move on to finishing this throttle body of yours.. I'm getting bored making fun of your front brake delete project.
silver-mod-o is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:21 PM
  #174  
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
custm2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by silver-mod-o
In all seriousness... To maintain braking, improve braking, and save weight, why not go to some nicer calipers and rotors up front and consider driveline braking for the rear one rotor and caliper stops both wheels... Less weight, more efficient, more mechanical advantage etc..
.
I think I have said about 15 times I plan to just look for lighter calipers for the front as the final product. I guess you over looked all of those posts just trying to be an *** and only project your opinon.
custm2500 is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:29 PM
  #175  
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
silver-mod-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SETx
Posts: 14,314
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Just my opinion.... Rriiiiigghttt... I've gotta go to bed, I'm going to be hungover enough as it is, and they let me work on peoples vehicles for a living so I probably should sleep this off hahaha...

I did read about your lighter calipers as a back-up plan or something, but all I could keep reading over and over was about a truck with no front brakes..
silver-mod-o is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:31 PM
  #176  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Three6GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 2,165
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Lol alright alright let's just close this thread and just wait for the final products...
Three6GMC is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:32 PM
  #177  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
1989k1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ravenna, MI
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gadgetized
[


Originally Posted by silver-mod-o
In all seriousness... To maintain braking, improve braking, and save weight, why not go to some nicer calipers and rotors up front and consider driveline braking for the rear one rotor and caliper stops both wheels... Less weight, more efficient, more mechanical advantage etc..
Do they even use driveline braking on anything fast?

I've always been told it was a bad idea for anything other than a mud or trail truck. If you have 4.10 gears a rotor on the pinion will be spinning 4.1 times faster than if it were at the wheel.
1989k1500 is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:40 PM
  #178  
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
custm2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Monster trucks run drive line brakes. They are fairly fast 60-70 but weigh a million pounds. They are often red hot in freestyle.

Not sure if the extream weight vs. high speeds cancel each other thus it should work just fine if they do.
custm2500 is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:42 PM
  #179  
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
silver-mod-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SETx
Posts: 14,314
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

It's mainly used on vehicles with a lot of rotational mass. So you're correct but I could see the advantages for someone wanting to save weight on a street truck... Would it really be worth it?? Probably not, I was mainly throwing info around to be a little helpful I guess... I know I've stepped on the guy's tiny feelings this evening a little... I know on a friends truck I've driven with a BBC, rockwells, 52" tires, some ungodly gear and a lot of power it stops that thing like right now :now: But I know that's apples/oranges to what were discussing here.
silver-mod-o is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:43 PM
  #180  
Staging Lane
 
HuskerZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Omaha
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by custm2500
Does anyone have the ability to calculate how much friction it would take 4000 lbs from 100 mph to 0 mph? This is the physics needed to determine an answer if it would be possible for the rear tires to offer that much friction.
This is kind of difficult to do on assumptions. I think the proper thing to do is find the coefficient of friction friction for the surface you will be on (race track) first. You can then calculate the distance it will take your truck to stop from 100 to 0mph given its mass and % of braking applied. On normal conditions this is used by giving the vehicle 100% braking but in this case it is kind of difficult to determine what the % would be. I would imagine the number is pretty low.
HuskerZ71 is offline  


Quick Reply: I can't fabricate?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.