New 2wd SS looks to be the shit!
08-11-2005, 10:51 AM
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Winston Salem NC
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zippy
that article is incorrect. it's supposed to be a 4L70E.
3.06 1rst
1.63 2nd
1.00 3rd
.70 4th.
3.06 1rst
1.63 2nd
1.00 3rd
.70 4th.
whats different with a 70 compared to a 60/65?
08-11-2005, 03:09 PM
#15
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by gamedawgx53
whats different with a 70 compared to a 60/65?
08-11-2005, 03:27 PM
#16
13 Second Truck Club
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East Texas
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by s3gulit
GM is still going wrong by not offering a reg cab 2wd SS....if they made that, i'd think the truck sales would go sky high since alot of people want that.
Dave
Dave
08-11-2005, 04:01 PM
#17
Need More N2O Mod
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Not in Koonerville MD anymore
Posts: 4,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was a GM rep at out silveradoss meet and he said to expect to see a 6.0 in regular cab 1/2 tons. but he really didn't give a date. he did say the new engine will be called "Vortec Max" we might even see some higher hp ratings in 07.
the 2wd ss is a great start for a performance truck.
the 2wd ss is a great start for a performance truck.
08-11-2005, 07:57 PM
#20
I'll be happy for anyone who buys one if GM actually builds one like this but pissed as hell because before I bought what I have now tried to have a (RCSB/6.0l/2WD/5 speed or auto) built and the dealer response was "no way" and "why would you want that anyway".
DUH.......................stupid salesmen.
DUH.......................stupid salesmen.