Notices
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

87 octane tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2007, 12:29 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
BlackLM7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 87 octane tune

I know this question may seem pointless but I think it's necessary in our world of rising gas prices. What kind of rwhp/rwtq can a bolt-on (CAI, headers, catback) 5.3 get with an "aggressive" 87 octane tune? Is it even possible to create an "aggressive" 87 tune with no hint of KR or detonation? Any info would be appreciated.
Old 06-05-2007, 12:36 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
truckmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OK
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlackLM7
Is it even possible to create an "aggressive" 87 tune with no hint of KR or detonation? Any info would be appreciated.
Not likely to really get "aggressive" since I would bet a scan would reveal some KR with a stock tune on most vehicles. As far as the rising prices go, the gap between the octanes is staying the same so realatively speaking the total cost gap from low to high octane is shrinking. In other words your not really saving as much as you think using 87 octane.
Old 06-05-2007, 12:38 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
 
nighthawk08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

On my truck I get more MPG out of my 93 tune than my 87 tune, so that makes it a no brainer when you factor in the perfromance.
Old 06-06-2007, 06:01 AM
  #4  
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
mcfarlnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,318
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

im running an 87 tune and i have added a bit of timing and have 0 KR. no dyno numbers though. butt meter says its running lots better though.
Old 06-06-2007, 07:38 AM
  #5  
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
trever1t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by colyneedsv8
On my truck I get more MPG out of my 93 tune than my 87 tune, so that makes it a no brainer when you factor in the perfromance.
The difference in a full tank is about $5. Just do the tune for the highest octane available

You also get the benefit of the better additives with premium.
Old 06-06-2007, 08:43 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
BlackLM7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the inputs. You all made some good points. I think I'll stick with a 93 octane tune instead.
Old 06-06-2007, 08:48 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The 405
Posts: 5,686
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

it only costs me like $4 more a tank to fil up with 91 instead of 87....i'd stick with 91
Old 06-06-2007, 10:14 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
alanderson1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Blytheville, AR
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's why PCM's have high and low octane tables. Tune your high octane table to 93 and your low octane table to 87. I don't know the exact details, but the PCM should take care of the rest.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rafe19
FORCED INDUCTION
73
10-18-2016 12:27 AM
Razor
Southern
8
12-01-2015 10:46 AM
713truck
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
08-18-2015 09:32 PM
cammed06
GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion
1
07-24-2015 12:09 PM



Quick Reply: 87 octane tune



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.