Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

B5908 - Fuel Mixture Spark Correction table question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2007 | 06:45 PM
  #1  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default B5908 - Fuel Mixture Spark Correction table question

I have a question about this table. Does this table operate all the time or just in PE?

The row values on this table are in GMEq. Do they translate like the following? Attached is my stock 4.8 table, I added the AFR column.



If so, does it mean given a certain AFR and RPM this is how much the PCM will add/substract Timing?

Does a Negative add timing and a Postive substract?
Old 12-17-2007 | 07:47 PM
  #2  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

All the time I do believe, but I think you have your AFR values figured on Lambda instead of EQ. Should be the other way around, above 1.0 is richer and below 1.0 is leaner. As far as timing, positive values add to the final value and negative ones subtract from the final value.
Old 12-17-2007 | 07:57 PM
  #3  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
All the time I do believe, but I think you have your AFR values figured on Lambda instead of EQ. Should be the other way around, above 1.0 is richer and below 1.0 is leaner. As far as timing, positive values add to the final value and negative ones subtract from the final value.
thanks for the answers so does this look better?


Old 12-17-2007 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

Yep, that looks right now.
Old 12-17-2007 | 09:52 PM
  #5  
dc_justin's Avatar
Hello Dave
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 3
From: San Diego, CA
Default

I concur with everything Rhino said.
Old 12-19-2007 | 11:03 PM
  #6  
Dirty Dave's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: kansas
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
All the time I do believe, but I think you have your AFR values figured on Lambda instead of EQ. Should be the other way around, above 1.0 is richer and below 1.0 is leaner. As far as timing, positive values add to the final value and negative ones subtract from the final value.
Less than 1.0 is richer higher than 1.0 is leaner. In other words .8 rich 1.2 lean.
Old 12-19-2007 | 11:05 PM
  #7  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

In Lambda terms yes, but EQ ratio is opposite.
Old 12-19-2007 | 11:18 PM
  #8  
Dirty Dave's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: kansas
Default

Didn't notice the eq.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
08-01-2015 08:45 AM
InsaneDomestics
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
5
07-27-2015 03:42 PM
bsn1989
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
0
07-16-2015 09:20 AM
Suburban2500
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
2
07-14-2015 03:10 AM
jrplz
GM Parts Classifieds
6
07-09-2015 01:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.