How personal is your VE table?
06-19-2006, 03:07 PM
#21
Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
That table looks similar to others Ive seen. I think some of it depends on the way you drive, if you adjust the throttle differently more-less aggressively trimming changes and the ve table looks different. This is the reason for ltft's, along with temp and baro changes etc....
Well, if I get aggressive, the "swell" in the 1600 to 1800rpm and 100 to 150 map area gets larger, obviously. And the less aggressive style of driving runs me through this "dip" area at 3600 to 4400 rpm and 105 to 150 map area.
I guess if you get into the lower rpm high map cell with less tps you'd probably see lower #'s here. Hmmm, maybe I am looking at it all wrong. Maybe the dip is just the "non-transitional" area of my ve table.
Anybody know how to come up with a plot filtering string to make it so only particular TPS% get logged. For example, nothing under 5%TPS or maybe nothing over 60%TPS?
06-19-2006, 07:23 PM
#23
Originally Posted by 1slowsilverado
Youll have to test this out cuz its been awhile, But for a filter try [SENS.90] < 5 AND [SENS.90] > 60
06-19-2006, 08:29 PM
#24
Originally Posted by thunder550
I sent you my tune right? My VE table is all wacked too....weird spikes and valleys. I'll try to get a pic put up when I get home tonight.
Thunders VE 1bar radix/3.0
06-19-2006, 09:14 PM
#25
Former Moderator :(
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOULEVARDS OF BOOST CALIFORNIA
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Magna Charger has never had any reason to mess with the VE table exept in the 100 -105 KPA area in the upper rpm range GM spent millions developing these maps and regardles of what they look like they work just fine on a stock engine.
06-19-2006, 09:31 PM
#27
Originally Posted by Crash Dummy
Magna Charger has never had any reason to mess with the VE table exept in the 100 -105 KPA area in the upper rpm range GM spent millions developing these maps and regardles of what they look like they work just fine on a stock engine.
Just seems some thing so aggressive in getting to the 105 line would need a little ve tweaking. Especially since it seems Magna leaves the PE enable stuff stock. Again, no experience, just from tunes I have seen posted up. No arguement here, I see how they work just fine on a stock table for the most part. Plus I understand Magna is trying to stay CARB approved. I imagine that puts some restraints on what you can mess with and what you can't.
My new ve table after putting in the plot filtering, no values under 5%TPS...
06-19-2006, 11:34 PM
#29
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Daytona Beach
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zick
Still in tuning process
Wow looking at all these rough VE tables im second guessing myself JK! heres mine...
Last edited by 1slowsilverado; 06-19-2006 at 11:57 PM.
06-20-2006, 12:09 AM
#30
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Daytona Beach
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dewmanshu
That's the ticket, I tried it on the way home, well I tried only greater than 5% tps to be shown [SENS.90]>5. VERY INTERESTING. I'll post a new ve table with the new error #'s applied in a few.