HPTuners VS EFILive
#21
#22
EFILIve is a superior product bottom line period. HPT has its place and we own HPT and use it. We have EFILive, TunerCat, Jet DST, DiabloSport, and about 10 more tuning packages. HPT is beginner friendlier than EFILIve. One reason is HPT has less parameters, but do you need them for a beginner that might be overwhelmed with the tuning process? Bill at HPT has helped me out with a few issues, but Ross has given me more that I could ever imagine in support. I know a lot of people start out with HPT and switch over to EFILIve as they get better at tuning and they need more parameters. HPT charges for Custom OS’s and EFILIve does not. HPT provides a product at a reasonable price that performs a reasonable function and it works, but you will have limits
TunerCat is by far the best for a tuner-shop that knows what they want. We can add in parameters as we feel that we need them. TC has no fees for additional cars, but the package is the most expensive and it does not have scan-ware.
TunerCat is by far the best for a tuner-shop that knows what they want. We can add in parameters as we feel that we need them. TC has no fees for additional cars, but the package is the most expensive and it does not have scan-ware.
#23
EFILIve is a superior product bottom line period. HPT has its place and we own HPT and use it. We have EFILive, TunerCat, Jet DST, DiabloSport, and about 10 more tuning packages. HPT is beginner friendlier than EFILIve. One reason is HPT has less parameters, but do you need them for a beginner that might be overwhelmed with the tuning process? I know a lot of people start out with HPT and switch over to EFILIve as they get better at tuning and they need more parameters. HPT charges for Custom OS’s and EFILIve does not. HPT provides a product at a reasonable price that performs a reasonable function and it works, but you will have limits
While in some applications we may have a few less tables(many unimportant) we have alot of far more important tables in many applications, starter check patches for engine swap applications, hundreds of additional T43 tables and support for applications that efi has no intentions of covering anytime soon.
-Bill
#24
I have to disagree with this blanket statement
While in some applications we may have a few less tables(many unimportant) we have alot of far more important tables in many applications, starter check patches for engine swap applications, hundreds of additional T43 tables and support for applications that efi has no intentions of covering anytime soon.
-Bill
While in some applications we may have a few less tables(many unimportant) we have alot of far more important tables in many applications, starter check patches for engine swap applications, hundreds of additional T43 tables and support for applications that efi has no intentions of covering anytime soon.
-Bill
#25
I never would have guessed foff, aka bill @hptuners is biased of hptuner. Why cant you say they are comparable products and put your input in? Instead of being completely one-sided and biased.
#26
-Bill
#27
I got an idea, answer my questions that you skipped around last time you were in one of these threads?! Which is like 3 threads ago, u haven't posted but 10 posts since then, aka February. Just say they are comparable, both have high points, and low points
#28
#30
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Porscharu914
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
14
01-20-2016 11:45 AM
Tydriver
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
45
10-23-2015 10:19 PM
supershift67
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
2
09-18-2015 09:21 PM