Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

Speed density tune...Why???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2011 | 11:36 AM
  #21  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,740
Likes: 204
From: Detroit
Default

I find it easier to write a temporary tune to it before doing MAF or VE calibration so that you don't have to filter out throttle transitions. Disable things like DFCO, COT, LTFTs, etc.. No fuel modifiers to skew the data.
Old 12-04-2011 | 11:44 AM
  #22  
2007chevy5.3l's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

I think for the GenIII guys running the MAF is probably your best bet. For GenIV, the VE table is alot more percise with a ton more cells, so I think you can get away from the MAF just fine if wanted. So far I am liking my SD tune, eventhough it still needs work.

Another thing, in closed loop my pcm would change the commanded AFRs while at part throttle, it would command a very lean mixture then drop down to super rich mixture while it should have been a straight 14.63 AFR. Well long story short, it doesnt do that any more in OLSD


Heres what the NNBS vs NBS VE tables compaired look like
Attached Thumbnails Speed density tune...Why???-sdtune.png   Speed density tune...Why???-sdtune1.png  

Last edited by 2007chevy5.3l; 12-04-2011 at 11:51 AM.
Old 12-04-2011 | 11:46 AM
  #23  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,740
Likes: 204
From: Detroit
Default

That's part of the reason I'd like to put the E38 in my 04...much more powerful platform.
Old 12-04-2011 | 11:47 AM
  #24  
2007chevy5.3l's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
That's part of the reason I'd like to put the E38 in my 04...much more powerful platform.
I agree, the E38 is pretty sweet when you figure it all out
Old 12-04-2011 | 12:01 PM
  #25  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
That's part of the reason I'd like to put the E38 in my 04...much more powerful platform.
That would be cool of you could figure out how to make the gauges work.
Old 12-04-2011 | 12:30 PM
  #26  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

Originally Posted by 2007chevy5.3l
I think for the GenIII guys running the MAF is probably your best bet. For GenIV, the VE table is alot more percise with a ton more cells, so I think you can get away from the MAF just fine if wanted. So far I am liking my SD tune, eventhough it still needs work.

Another thing, in closed loop my pcm would change the commanded AFRs while at part throttle, it would command a very lean mixture then drop down to super rich mixture while it should have been a straight 14.63 AFR. Well long story short, it doesnt do that any more in OLSD


Heres what the NNBS vs NBS VE tables compaired look like
Do you have your rear o2's connected and did you try your stock tune?
Old 12-04-2011 | 12:38 PM
  #27  
2007chevy5.3l's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

Yup they are connected, and yeah i did but stock tune sucks
Old 12-04-2011 | 12:48 PM
  #28  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

Originally Posted by 2007chevy5.3l
Yup they are connected, and yeah i did but stock tune sucks
Did the fueling act up with the stock tune?
Old 12-04-2011 | 01:27 PM
  #29  
2007chevy5.3l's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
Did the fueling act up with the stock tune?
Yes. Its a cat oxygenate thing for emissions thats built into the O2 sensor parameters. When disabled it goes away.
Old 12-04-2011 | 02:54 PM
  #30  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 4
From: OH IO :(
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
I have to respectfully disagree that sd is more precise as the maf is a direct measurment of airflow unlike manifold pressure. Every street tune should start as sd to nail the ve first. At 97 kpa at wot, you can be at 6700 hz on the maf or 9700 hz. The maf isn't a table that has to be fooled. Gm calibrates the maf table by predetermined flow figures of the maf. When you change what goes on in front of or behind the maf, you likely will have to alter the maf table.

As Klug mentioned on big cam setups, sd may control idle fuelin better depending on where the maf is located. Also, sd may prove to be a little more responsive in most cases because a lot of people don't nail the ve, and the maf. Then you have 2 tables having to blend to get fueling correct at cruise and transient stages, it can cause it to be less responsive.

That being said my dd (99 cavalier) is sd from the factory. A lot of vehicles are. It doesn't have to have the maf, but on vehicles originally equipped with it, it is great.
I guess i should state that SD is accurate when your out of MAF range and your fooling the tables. Its def. more accurate in my case

Ive also been very impressed with another similiar setup truck, SD tuned, running a decent sized but not too crazy blower cam that was N/A.

I dont feel you have to Go SD on an N/A setup, but if you do you should learn how to tune because as the weather changes so will some driveability items.

Now that its cold i have to apply a lil throttle to get my girl to fire up. I just havent tweaked that aspect yet as i wont be driving it this winter.


Quick Reply: Speed density tune...Why???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.