Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

Tuning AFR using narrowband readings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2006 | 03:46 PM
  #1  
Holty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Notorious BIG
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default Tuning AFR using narrowband readings

This topic may have already been covered, but i thought i should bring it back up. I know some will argue with me about being able to get your AFR close to what you command by using the narrowband 02 readings from hptuners, efilive, or whatever. From my experience, this is NOT true. Before installing my wideband, i was seeing roughly 890mv 02 readings on my hptuners scanner. Not knowing any better and from reading on here and other forums that you would like to see around 920mv from narrowband 02's at WOT. Using that info, i was constantly thinking i was slightly on the LEAN side, therefore trying to fix this, i was always adding fuel to my PE multiplyer. Well, after installing my wideband, i found that was NOT the case. I actually was running VERY rich at WOT, somehwere in the 10.5:1 AFR range. Even though my narrownband 02 readings where showing me slightly lean (consistantly), i was actually running VERY rich when in PE.

So, just to all you newb tuners, make sure you have a wideband or you may be going down the wrong road from the very beginning (like i was).
Old 07-11-2006 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
Yelo's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 1
From: Geneseo, NY
Default



Using the narrowband 02's is pretty much the same as guessing, they're only accurate at 14.7:1...at anything other than that they are completely inaccurate !!!
Old 07-11-2006 | 04:49 PM
  #3  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Im more concerned with track numbers than imperical numbers. If I run a better time with a wot afr of 14:1 and I dont have KR I could give a **** about anything else.

But thats me my wot runs are very limited time wise I dont go wot for a long sprint of time and I rarely do any racing on the highway.

If I had an FI motor I would worry more about it but for those of us with low compression NA setups I dont see any big issues as long as common sense is used.
Old 07-11-2006 | 06:09 PM
  #4  
Wheatley's Avatar
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 2
From: Sealy/Katy TX
Default

Like said above,the narrow bands is not accurate really at WOT,only stoich 14.7.I would get a wideband honestly.
Old 07-11-2006 | 07:04 PM
  #5  
Yelo's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 1
From: Geneseo, NY
Default

I will say that MOST of us use the Narrowband to guesstimate the AFR, I'm as guilty of it as anyone but it's just not the right way....nor is it safe to do on a performance motor. A wideband IS expensive, but it's alot cheaper than replacing a rotating assembly because you popped holes in pistons from running too lean, or replacing a block because you ran too rich and washed the cylinder walls down causing scoring

Last edited by Yelo; 07-11-2006 at 07:27 PM.
Old 07-11-2006 | 07:26 PM
  #6  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 4
From: OH IO :(
Default

i agree totally. If you have the money for F I, you have the money for the essential gauges.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Oobray
8-Lug Truck Performance
70
06-13-2022 04:38 AM
DrX
FUEL SYSTEMS
33
08-28-2015 09:50 AM
Ls3silverado
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
0
07-31-2015 05:22 PM
GMCtrk
FORCED INDUCTION
67
07-17-2015 07:39 PM
Mossyoakglock
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
0
07-17-2015 09:30 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.